Well... What do you guys think of it? It's quite a popular synth that's for
sure. Most people who have one insist that there music would not be the
same without it. I kind of have a hard time believing there is really that
much difference between the older analog synths. They all seem to have that
same parameters for sound construction. And, those perimeters weren't that
interesting to began with. Mostly the Filters are the big distinguishing
factor. If all you want to do is filter movements then you should be in
really good hands. I try to look for synths that have other things besides
that. Ring modulation, FM, Wave modulation... Stuff like that. On the other
hand, Some people might point out that simplicity breeds ease of use and
leaves you with more time to write music... So, I don't really have any
recommendations. If you listen to Aphex, a lot of his stuff uses really
simple 2 oscillator Subtractive synthesis (what you have) and not that much
filter movement. At least on his latter stuff. All that rest off that crazy
noise is just DSP effects and Computer manipulation. But, the base of it
all is really just simple synthesis.
Mark wrote:
quoted 11 lines My roomate and I have been writing some odd idm music for the last year> My roomate and I have been writing some odd idm music for the last year
> or two and we've been using an old synth that has been passed down to
> him through family (don't ask). It's a Juno 106. Any comments as to
> how good this synth is or how much it may be worth? We might sell it
> for other newer equipment.
>
> -mark
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org
For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org