179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Renee Baker
To:
Date:
22 Apr 1996 09:48:02 -0700
Subject:
(idm) Re : Orbital ( the BOX )
Msg-Id:
<07370317BB842027*/c=us/admd=telemail/prmd=nasa/o=jpl/ou=ccmail/s=Baker/g=Nanette/i=R/@MHS>
Mbox:
idm.9604.gz
I bought my copy on Saturday so that I could join in the discussion. Personally, I LOVE track #2. I think I'm going to record the floor boards in the kitchen and my bedroom immediately. I've got tons of sound potential right under my feet! I love the tinny sound of the piano and the harpsicord is dead on right for the lettering of the single. My only question is this: What's the significance of the painting on the cover? It seems out of place. Comments? Renee renee.baker@jpl.nasa.gov _______________________________________________________________________________ Subject: (idm) Re : Orbital ( the BOX ) From: PaulT23@aol.com at Internet Date: 19-04-1996 13:59 My .02 cents on the recent Orbital discussion(s) - two days late as usual. I also disagree with Fresh. Unlike the first respondant, I have indeed heard & bought the record. I like the first three tracks pretty well. I think people should just listen to the music and decide if they like it or not without needing to compare it to something that the same artist has done before. There are enough censoring/limiting factors in the music industry without a groups fans demanding that alternative/electronic artists continue to sound the same. If a band tries something new, they are probably not going to be brilliant at it immediately. A little patience perhaps.