In a message dated 1/02/00 10:34:45 w_technoir@yahoo.com writes:
quoted 1 line "more intelligent dub techno"> "more intelligent dub techno"
Actually misquoted from the original post, and as usual - misinterpreted,
which is common fuel for this list.
What I said was:
"Upon retrospect this EP commands more an intelligent dub techno approach..."
RE: Rapaciolli EP posted 27/01/00 3:24:33
I *Do Not* refer to this EP as being more intelligent than others, just that
it *commands more* - the intelligent approach espoused by the class producers
of this sound. By this I mean that it really *highlights* this unique form of
music.
Why can't people just accept that the notion of intelligence with a
particular form of music that it sounds the way it does because it may *move*
the mind in certain ways. (check out also certain forms of jazz and classical
for mental effect)
A_Zed
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: idm-unsubscribe@hyperreal.org
For additional commands, e-mail: idm-help@hyperreal.org