179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Sugatis
To:
Date:
Sat, 23 Mar 1996 12:14:13 -0800
Subject:
Re: CDs (Re: (idm) Aphex Twin - On, Xepha)
Msg-Id:
<v01530500ad7a088358e3@[205.138.245.51]>
Mbox:
idm.9603.gz
quoted 3 lines Vinyl just plain sucks, unless you're one of those hopeless romantic types>Vinyl just plain sucks, unless you're one of those hopeless romantic types >that thinks anything from the past is so much better than the present that >you can ignore the facts and convince yourself otherwise.
Whoa... be careful here... I would suggest sticking to your otherwise very good objective, empirical analysis of cd's versus vinyl, and stay away from this whole "sucks" and personal attack idea, unless you want to get everybody pissed off. You are right though... in the empirical sense, cd's beat vinyl hands down, more frequency response, greater clarity, higher signal to noise ratio, better dynamic range, and more importantly resiliance and portability (and the ability to play them in the car, for which vinyl is slightly ill suited). But I still like vinyl just the same. When I fire up the ole turntable, it really does "feel" better to me than putting the little cd into the player... maybe cos vinyl is analogue, ou know, kinda like a picture of the sound, whereas cd's are digital, just a description of the sound, and somehow my mind can perceive this difference. Vinyl to me just feels neater, that's all. And the sound isn't really that much worse than cd, usually I don't really notice. So while you certainly are entitled to your well supported opinion here about the technological merits of the c format, please do not call me stupid ("hopelessly romantic...ignore the facts"), and such, cos I happen to dig vinyl too.