179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Kent Williams
To:
Eric van de Leur
Cc:
Date:
Wed, 20 Dec 1995 10:00:54 -0600 (CST)
Subject:
Re: (idm) Re: trance atlantic (shite or (huge?)
Msg-Id:
<Pine.LNX.3.91.951220095332.17960D-100000@soli.inav.net>
In-Reply-To:
<199512200804.AA097046687@brisbane.sce.philips.nl>
Mbox:
idm.9512.gz
On Wed, 20 Dec 1995, Eric van de Leur wrote:
quoted 7 lines Trance Atlantic 2, will I face the same quandry?> >Trance Atlantic 2, will I face the same quandry? > > No, IMO. TA-2 is much better. But it stays a compilation, I have never found > a compilition cd which has only good tracks (who has?? names, names). I think > some tracks on TA-1 need some more time (there are also tracks on it that > don't get any time from me anymore as well). >
TA2 is optional -- it has some tracks I might not otherwise buy that I like (the KHand) and one that I really really like (the Queen Mecca). At this point I've got all four TEX's and both TA's, and I like the little books, so it's a trainspotter thing. Stupidest track on it in my opinion is the Josh Wink track. 'Just a track' yeah right. I thought my tracks were slapdash sometimes, but Josh Wink should cut his hair if he thinks he can just fuck around aimlessly with his MC202 and release it to worldwide acclaim. He can do better. I frankly wish that the artists would consider giving them a really good track rather than some out take. I guess they feel like it will take away from their 'real' releases if they let TEX put out a gem... I did listen to Trance Atlantic 1 all the way through Monday at work and I think it has really held up. (319) 338 6053 (home) (319) 626 6700 x 219 (work) (319) 626 3489 (fax)