179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
To:
Date:
Wed, 15 Nov 95 21:58:06 -0800
Subject:
Re: (idm) IDM
Msg-Id:
<9511160555.AA04536@hub.scp.caltech.edu>
In-Reply-To:
<9511152032.AA31005@cpca6.uea.ac.uk>
Mbox:
idm.9511.gz
A clarification... I don't mean to jump on any particular genre. Indeed, that is the very behavior which I think is silly! I think genre names are useful solely as broad classifications of music. They serve as place cards in your local underground vinyl shop. They serve as a quick way to tell someone what the basic feel of a track is. I think that we will find 'intelligent' and 'unintelligent' dance music in each of the dance genres. I personally find that my favorite groups, and the groups I tend to consider the most innovative, actually cross genre boundaries. They unite disparate elements from different musical frameworks into one glorious whole. So, I think we should talk about groups rather than genres! I do not that think that underground equals innovative or mainstream equals boring. Your mileage may vary. [fletcher] - [please check accompanying instructions before using this test bay - the o r b]