179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Mark Kolmar
To:
Chris.Hilker
Cc:
Date:
Fri, 27 Oct 1995 17:04:41 -0500 (CDT)
Subject:
Re: (idm) Why Oh Why part 1: Cabaret Voltaire and their vocals
Msg-Id:
<Pine.PTX.3.91.951027163950.14291D-100000@ccs1.ccs.nslsilus.org>
In-Reply-To:
<199510271504.IAA25567@taz.hyperreal.com>
Mbox:
idm.9510.gz
quoted 2 lines 'Groovy' and 'Technology' made for an effective one-two punch alienati> 'Groovy' and 'Technology' made for an effective one-two punch alienating > their former audience from them.
_Technology_ does contain a small handful of brilliance. Stripped of the link back to the earlier Virgin material, it would have been a stronger release. I do not consider it to be part of their normal development, nor do I believe it was intended to be. The reasons for its existence are a mystery to me; perhaps some contractual obligation? The element of their audience who would have been alienated by these releases are those unable or unwilling to follow them into the new territory they explored there, and thereafter. Some were actually dismayed at the "commercial" sound of _The Crackdown_, certainly one of the least commercial records ever to be accused of being a sell-out. The development of their sound always seemed to me to progress logically from their previous work. Their early sound prefigured the IDM/Bleep scene; then they integrated these influences and continued to push the envelope after a couple of hesitant steps near the start of the decade.