On Sat, 7 Oct 1995, Jon Drukman wrote:
quoted 6 lines At 8:06 PM 10/7/95, Goethe wrote:> At 8:06 PM 10/7/95, Goethe wrote:
> >I guess live TG sucks then. Well, you may think so, but they are
> >considered by many to be innovators in electronic improvisation.
>
> are we talking live music or recorded music? i hold live stuff to an
> entirely different standard.
I don't expect live material to be as polished but I generally
just judge it as music, it's either good or not. I don't
lower my standards of what I like because something is live instead of
studio. e.g. Some of TG's live material is superior to some of their studio
material.
quoted 1 line 95% of Fax sucks too then (I know some would agree this statement...I> > 95% of Fax sucks too then (I know some would agree this statement...I
> >don't!)
quoted 1 line me neither! 99.9% of Fax sucks!> me neither! 99.9% of Fax sucks!
If 99.9% sucks, then I guess you've heard all 115 CD's and 90 12"s they've
released? I think you'd be suprised if you had. Sorry if *I'm* being grouchy
but it gets a little tiring to hear people (you're not the only one)
saying this "sucks" or that "sucks." (*especially* if people haven't
heard a lot of what they are dismissing.) And saying something "sucks"
doesn't contribute anything, it just make people upset that you're
putting down music they like.
quoted 3 lines you're being misled by the word "perfect". we were talking about being> you're being misled by the word "perfect". we were talking about being
> able to enjoy music that may be deficient in one area but strong in
> another.
Why bother trying to enjoy music that you view as deficient though?
Unless maybe there is little music you think is not deficient in some
area, in which case you have no choice I suppose...
Still looking for B12-Prelude Pt. 1 CD. :)
Tony