179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Christian Bartholdsson
To:
Date:
Tue, 3 Oct 95 10:55:49 +0100
Subject:
Re: Goldie / jungle
Msg-Id:
<9510030955.AA02008@Minsk.DoCS.UU.SE>
Mbox:
idm.9510.gz
Tom Churchill writes:
quoted 4 lines Agreed, it's good to have some intricate and mutating breakbeats as a> Agreed, it's good to have some intricate and mutating breakbeats as a >diversion/alternative to the 4/4 kick, but I wouldn't want to have breakbeats >*all night* - there's loads and loads of good house and techno which is much >easier to dance to...
Yeah, house and techno are for wimps. (joke, alright?)
quoted 7 lines Jungle is not meant to be listening music.>> Jungle is not meant to be listening music. > > You can't generalise all jungle like this. There's loads of jungle which is >made to be listened to, or chill out to. Also, a lot of the jungle which *is* >danced to stands up better than 'dance-oriented' techno for home listening, >mainly because of the constant variation, and (sorry) intelligence in the drum >programming...
Well, to me jungle is about the drum and the bass and sub bass frequencies just don't translate very well on home equipment. Of course I know there's a lot of "jungle" that's more or less listening music, but there's the old war of definitions. Is Namlook "techno"? Is Goldie "jungle"? When you move so far away from the original idea that it becomes something else... (no need to go deeper into that) - chris@minsk.docs.uu.se