179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Flacid Dolphins Us
To:
IDM Listserv
Date:
Wed, 14 Jun 1995 09:27:35 -0700 (PDT)
Subject:
Re: Query??
Msg-Id:
<Pine.SUN.3.91.950614091823.6049I-100000@nethost.multnomah.lib.or.us>
In-Reply-To:
<9506122204.AA13947@selway.umt.edu>
Mbox:
idm.9506.gz
On Mon, 12 Jun 1995, ozymandias G desiderata wrote:
quoted 5 lines Is there anybody but me that sees the irony in the fact that> Is there anybody but me that sees the irony in the fact that > it frequently seems like techno musicians are making the music of > tomorrow with the technology of ten years ago? Is that how long it > takes to understand a given synthesizer? Maybe I'd better stick with > guitar.
Well, futurism was not particularly in vogue when all of the futuristic equipment was coming out. Much of the new wavetable/digital stuff does not have wacky features and sound capabilities, just acoustic-sound-imitative potential in the design. You can get interesting sounds, but the harmonics of an old analog synth are more extreme and create more *connotations* of futuristic sound. For instance, think of science fiction movies from 1970 and 1990: which had more wacked out sounds/timbres? 85-95 has been about imitative-sound-making synth-engines it seems, not whacked-out-futuristic modulars... David Chandler - chandler@nethost.multnomah.lib.or.us (503)301-3011 grep -i casio goodwillbins >> mystudio ; grep -i atari goodwillbins >> mystudio ;