179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Mark Kolmar
To:
Tim Fothergill
Cc:
Date:
Sun, 4 Jun 1995 13:28:08 -0500 (CDT)
Subject:
Re: Nine Inch Twin
Msg-Id:
<Pine.PTX.3.91.950604131922.5392D-100000@ccs.nslsilus.org>
In-Reply-To:
<44FB712966@pear.le.ac.uk>
Mbox:
idm.9506.gz
If I were suddenly to move into some bizarro world where everything only comes out on flexi-disc and 8-track, that would not stop me from listening to music. The reason the companies don't want to deal with vinyl comes down to two words: defects and weight. They ship vinyl to your local megastore, the store sells it to the consumer, he gets it home and it's warped. He brings it back to the shop, the shop gives him another and puts the warped one in the back room. At some point the shop sorts out the defects by distributor and ships them back. CDs weigh less and not as many are returned. It's too bad, but that's economics. I really liked it around '87 when you could buy LP or CD of most titles, LP for maybe $8.99, CD for maybe $13.99. Of course that CD only cost $2 to make but I am not going to tackle that subject now. On Sun, 4 Jun 1995, Tim Fothergill wrote:
quoted 9 lines Mark Kolmar wrote:> Mark Kolmar wrote: > > >I guess what I'm saying is, don't let the record company folks stop you > >from listening to what you want to hear merely because they don't issue it > >on the format you prefer. Buy a CD player -- not a crap one either (if > > The main thing that really pisses me off though is that someone somewhere, probably > some fat, money-grubbing, middle-aged fuckwit who probably knows nothing about music, > decides one day that vinyl isn't a viable format. Why does everyone have to follow