179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
vilexile
Cc:
idm
Date:
Tue, 25 Apr 1995 11:03:41 -0700 (PDT)
Subject:
Re: dead dog aliases don't wear black
Msg-Id:
<Pine.3.89.9504251035.A15382-0100000@netcom5>
In-Reply-To:
<MAPI.Id.0016.00616d65737320204143344430303142@MAPI.to.RFC822>
Mbox:
idm.9504.gz
On Tue, 25 Apr 1995, James Skilton wrote:
quoted 1 line vilexile wrote on Mon, 24 Apr 95 18:27:59 BST :> vilexile wrote on Mon, 24 Apr 95 18:27:59 BST :
quoted 6 lines Have Plaid always been the same two people? Meaning are the songs on> > Have Plaid always been the same two people? Meaning are the songs on > > Bytes, etc, credited to Plaid really full blown BDP and Plaid just now > > stole off with the name, or have Plaid always been the same subset? > > > > If so, were there others? Not enough configurations for all the names, I > > dun think.
quoted 5 lines I believe Plaid has indeed always been the same subset - I came across a> I believe Plaid has indeed always been the same subset - I came across a > discussion about the various black dog aliases a while back - I can't remember > who was what etc., and there are lets see 7 possible personnel configurations, > how many names have there been? The tracklisting of Bytes is a good start > point.
I count seven names plus Black Dog Productions plus The Black Dog plus Echo Mike. This just from Bytes, not the discog,which I think is more densely populated with aliases. Maybe BDP are like Reload and come up with a new name each time they start drinking a different lite beer. It's funny to see these little collectives get greedy and start trying to take credit for what had been semi-anonymous work. Maybe GC are having a little spat too. At least the Plaid ep is infinitely better than Spanners so we need not be too upset about the BD, but the idea of there never being another 76 14 is pretty horrifying. :( einexile in a tiny box