179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Cullen
To:
Date:
Tue, 24 Jan 1995 11:13:15 -0700 (MST)
Subject:
Re: (313) Drugs and Music
Msg-Id:
<Pine.SUN.3.90.950124110623.20265B@xmission>
In-Reply-To:
<199501241703.MAA02781@zork.tiac.net>
Mbox:
idm.9501.gz
quoted 6 lines From: "Kent Williams" <cadsi.com!kent@elvis.cadsi.com>> >From: "Kent Williams" <cadsi.com!kent@elvis.cadsi.com> > >Subject: Re: (313) Drugs and Music > >X-UIDL: 790966898.000 > > > >How is taking E at a dance any worse (or any better) than drinking a pitcher > >at the Red Stallion and going line dancing?
Tough call here. The neurotoxicity of E is still a hotly debated issue. Anyone taking the stuff ought to realize that they're rolling the dice every time.
quoted 5 lines I stopped taking drugs when I started programming computers. I needed those> >I stopped taking drugs when I started programming computers. I needed those > >brain cells I was sending on vacation. I don't do anything now except the > >odd three-beer buzz. But all those acid trips listening to "Phaedra" taught me > >where the music can take you, and now I feel just as tripped listening to > >good music as I ever did, without the hangover.
Sigh... That three beer buzz is sending a lot more brain cells packing than all your acid trips combined. I can guarantee you that. I'm also not familiar with the hangover you refer to. I can at least agree with you that after a point the drug isn't really necessary. Anybody interested in IDM has to recognize what an important role drugs have played in its evolution. I won't criticize any one for their own abstinence, but it's important to understand the TREMENDOUS impact of LSD on popular music of the last 30 years.