179,854Messages
9,130Senders
30Years
342mboxes

← back to listing · view thread

From:
Teep
To:
Date:
Thu, 27 Oct 94 21:37:28 -800
Subject:
Trancemaster vs. Portishead
Msg-Id:
<9410290135.AA14744@MIT.EDU>
Mbox:
idm.9410.gz
TIME OUT
quoted 3 lines Anyway, the point is, there seem to be two camps in IDM (the list); the more> Anyway, the point is, there seem to be two camps in IDM (the list); the more > Trance-oriented group (which I'll extend as far as to encompass, e.g., the > mu-Ziq lovers, of which I count myself)
that's one extension that i would HIGHLY disagree with, please name me one track other than *ad misericordiam* that is even remotely *trance*
quoted 4 lines and the more Gotta Have Da Funque-oriented group (no prizes for guessing who> and the more Gotta Have Da Funque-oriented group (no prizes for guessing who > are in this crew (-: ). I don't tend to see the former group dissing on the > latter here too often. But the latter group seem to take great glee in doing > the same to the former.
does anyone know what greg is talking about? i'm lost. i do know that there are a few dangerous generalizations flying around in a post that is sugar coated with rodney king quote???
quoted 2 lines In the words of that great late 20th Century philosopher, Rodney King (-:> In the words of that great late 20th Century philosopher, Rodney King (-: > "Can't we all just get along?"
sure we can! shall we start by forgiving the latter group from dissing the former? or shall we start by taking down the fence you just put up between the *two camps* actually, i'd prefer to pretend that this ugly thread was a nightmare (and i mean that, to all, please feel free to respond to me in private) Teep (aran@mit.edu) on now: dead alive :(fucking R rated version from Ballbuster video)